<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validating an entire site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/</link>
	<description>A pragmatic approach to web standards and accessibility</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scrambled</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrambled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, update I have it working sort of but nothing happens when I run either script except that crawlsite does crawl the site, dos box - I'm running Windows - showing all the links but doesn't output to a file? I've specified a file for it write to and massvalidate runs for about a second then nothing?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, update I have it working sort of but nothing happens when I run either script except that crawlsite does crawl the site, dos box - I&#8217;m running Windows - showing all the links but doesn&#8217;t output to a file? I&#8217;ve specified a file for it write to and massvalidate runs for about a second then nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrambled</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrambled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've just downloaded the W3C Validator and noticed the check script is completely different to your version any tips on mods needed?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just downloaded the W3C Validator and noticed the check script is completely different to your version any tips on mods needed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ben Hammersley's RSS validation version is great. We always use it and it never failed. I would reccomend it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Hammersley&#8217;s RSS validation version is great. We always use it and it never failed. I would reccomend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I will leave comment nine here as an interesting specimen of comment spam. Does he really think that people will be interested in following links after statements like "Now I already year of the free person with weighty incom!"?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will leave comment nine here as an interesting specimen of comment spam. Does he really think that people will be interested in following links after statements like &#8220;Now I already year of the free person with weighty incom!&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Johansson</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Johansson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 09:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-137</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tim: You can put them anywhere, as long as the htmldata library is in the same folder as crawlsite.py. You also need to rename The htmldata script to htmldata.py. I put everything in the validator/htdocs folder.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim: You can put them anywhere, as long as the htmldata library is in the same folder as crawlsite.py. You also need to rename The htmldata script to htmldata.py. I put everything in the validator/htdocs folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-136</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Where are you putting the crawlsite and massvalidate scripts? I've got everything working up to this point, but I'm a newbie.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are you putting the crawlsite and massvalidate scripts? I&#8217;ve got everything working up to this point, but I&#8217;m a newbie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Meiert</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Meiert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 11:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You can also use the "Validate entire site" option of the (web-based) &lt;a href="http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/"&gt;WDG HTML validator&lt;/a&gt; (which is per default enabled if you try &lt;a href="http://uitest.com/en/check/"&gt;UITest.com's Site Check&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also use the &#8220;Validate entire site&#8221; option of the (web-based) <a href="http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/">WDG HTML validator</a> (which is per default enabled if you try <a href="http://uitest.com/en/check/">UITest.com&#8217;s Site Check</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-134</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great stuff - being on a PowerBook, I expect I'll be finding this very useful in future.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I had the same issue at work recently. We solved it pretty quickly, as a developer had built an XML validator using a stock .NET XML validation control. It took him about 90 minutes to whip it into reasonable shape, which was pretty cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff - being on a PowerBook, I expect I&#8217;ll be finding this very useful in future.</p>
<p>I had the same issue at work recently. We solved it pretty quickly, as a developer had built an XML validator using a stock .NET XML validation control. It took him about 90 minutes to whip it into reasonable shape, which was pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Johansson</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Johansson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 17:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-130</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Neat. Thanks for compiling this info. I got it working after a bit of fiddling around - the "check" script in my installation of the W3C validator seems to be a different version than the script you modified. I had the validator installed already, so I suppose it could be an older version... not sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat. Thanks for compiling this info. I got it working after a bit of fiddling around - the &#8220;check&#8221; script in my installation of the W3C validator seems to be a different version than the script you modified. I had the validator installed already, so I suppose it could be an older version&#8230; not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.standards-schmandards.com/2005/massvalidate/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8888/?p=20#comment-122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, perhaps Ben could shed some light on why it's not working for some URLs. I guess an intranet would throw a spanner in the works somewhat.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Oh I think you have to use "site:www.standards-schmandards.com" instead of "site:http://www.standards-schmandards.com" .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, perhaps Ben could shed some light on why it&#8217;s not working for some URLs. I guess an intranet would throw a spanner in the works somewhat.</p>
<p>Oh I think you have to use &#8220;site:www.standards-schmandards.com&#8221; instead of &#8220;site:http://www.standards-schmandards.com&#8221; .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
